When “golden
age” comic book heroes first made the transition
to the big screen, they did so with near superhuman
speed. Superman, who debuted in the first issue of
Action Comics in 1938, was by 1941 already the star
of a series of animated shorts; a 15-episode, live-action
movie serial starring Kirk Alyn would follow seven
years later. Fawcett Comics’ Captain Marvel – famous
for his shape-changing cries of “Shazam!” – had
his own live-action serial only a year after his
first print appearance in 1940. The Batman, introduced
by Detective Comics in 1939, became the subject of
serials in 1943 and 1949. Timely Comics’ Captain
America, launched 1941, made his serial debut
in 1944.
THE
TOP COMIC
BOOK MOVIES!!
(domestic
grosses in millions)
1.
|
Spider-Man
(2002) |
$405
|
2.
|
Batman
(1989) |
251
|
3.
|
Men
in Black (1997) |
250
|
4.
|
Men in Black II (2002) |
192
|
5.
|
Batman
Forever (1995) |
184
|
6.
|
Batman
Returns (1992) |
162
|
7.
|
X-Men
(2000) |
157
|
8.
|
Teenage
Mutant Ninja Turtles (1990) |
135
|
9.
|
Superman
(1978) |
134
|
10.
|
The
Mask (1994) |
120
|
11.
|
Superman
II (1980) |
108
|
12.
|
Batman
and Robin (1997) |
107
|
13.
|
Road
to Perdition (2002) |
104
|
14.
|
Casper
(1995) |
100
|
15.
|
Blade
II (2002) |
81
|
| |
|
|
|
|
The first “feature-length” superhero movie
appears to have been the 58-minute 1951 cheapie “Superman
and the Mole Men,” which was actually a big-screen
spin-off of the still-gestating “Adventures of
Superman” TV series starring George Reeves. The
second superhero feature, 1966’s “Batman,” was
similarly a spin-off of the Adam West TV franchise
popular at the time.
The
era of the big-budget superhero movie didn’t
arrive until 1978’s “Superman,” a
smash with critics and audiences alike. Shot for
$55 million (large hunks of it earmarked for the
salaries of top-billed Marlon Brando and Gene Hackman),
the special-effects extravaganza came to gross more
than $300 million worldwide.
The
phenomenal success of “Superman” didn’t
set off so much a drive toward comic book adaptations
as it did a drive toward more “Superman” movies.
The 1980 sequel, actually filmed concurrently with
the 1978 original, was well-received; 1983’s “Superman
III,” co-starring Richard Pryor, was not. A
muddled 1984 spin-off, “Supergirl,” remains
almost universally disdained, as does 1987’s “Superman
IV: The Quest For Peace,” which essentially
nailed the franchise’s coffin closed for a
decade and a half.
The only other notable comic book adaptation before
1989 was Lucasfilm’s “Howard the Duck,” a
1986 commercial and critical dud that nonetheless
marked the first big-screen adventure of a Marvel
Comics character.
Things
changed dramatically in 1989, the year “Teenage
Mutant Ninja Turtles” became New Line’s
most successful movie ever and Tim Burton’s “Batman” did
what no “Superman” movie could: emerge
as its year’s top grosser. (With a worldwide
take exceeding $400 million, “Batman” actually
turned out to be the biggest moneymaker since 1985!)
Perhaps
because Batman and the Ninja Turtles illustrated
so dramatically that “Superman” wasn’t
the only comic-book hero capable of spawning a blockbuster,
studios all over Hollywood began licensing scores
of 4-color do-gooders. Where a total of five movies
based on comic-books – mostly “Superman” sequels – were
released in the 1980s, at least 20 comic-spawned
epics graced big screens in the subsequent decade
(more if one counts “Captain America,” “The
Punisher” and “The Fantastic Four” – stillborn
productions, all based on Marvel properties but never
released to U.S. moviehouses).
Surprisingly,
most of the ‘90s comic-book movies
greenlighted in the Caped Crusader’s wake were
not based on properties published by the giants DC
and Marvel, but by smaller independent companies.
The biggest comic-book movie of the decade, “Men
in Black,” was based on a title from tiny Malibu
Comics. Miramax’s “The Crow” series
nested at Kitchen Sink Press. “Casper” and “Richie
Rich” are Harvey Comics titles. “Spawn” emerged
out of upstart Image Comics. “The Mask,” “Timecop,” “Barb
Wire” and “Mystery Men” all originated
at relative newcomer Dark Horse Comics.
Warner
Bros., which – thanks to a 1969 merger
with DC Comics owner Kinney National Services – enjoys
exclusive access to dozens of the most iconic characters
in comicdom, shockingly hasn’t released a superhero
film since 1997, the year “Batman & Robin” and
the Shaquille O’Neal vehicle “Steel” both
stumbled at the box office.
Nature
abhors even a superheroic vacuum, and one could
argue persuasively that the movies’ “Marvel
era” began in 1998 with New Line’s “Blade,” the
first bona fide movie hit based on a classic Marvel
property. The superpowered vampire slayer garnered
a domestic gross of $70 million, and last year’s “Blade
II” outgrossed its original by more than $10
million.
2000’s “X-Men,” based on far better
known Marvel characters, took in more than twice
as much as “Blade”: a muscular $157 million.
And “Spider-Man,” based on another high-profile
Marvel property, grossed more than twice as much
as “X-Men”: more than $405 million, making
it not only 2002’s top earner but also the
fourth-highest-grossing movie of all time.
Which
means, as the following
feature illustrates perhaps
too vividly, it’ll be a while before
the movies are done with men and women in brightly-colored
tights. 